Viewing as:
Showing data filtered for:
An Independent Platform Risk Tracker

Understanding the algorithm
behind the anxiety

Evidence-based analysis of how social media algorithms shape the mental health trajectories of Australian children and young people. All data sourced from government, statutory, and academic research.

Data last reviewed: March 2026 · Next review: June 2026
0
% of children aged
8–12 on social media
0
% of teens 13–15
using platforms
0
% rise in youth
mental disorders
Crisis Indicators — Australia

Youth mental health is declining at a rate unprecedented in recorded Australian data.

+57%
Rise in severe psychological distress among 18–24 year olds between 2017 and 2021 — NSW Population Health Survey
1.3M
Australian children aged 8–12 estimated to be using social media in breach of minimum age policies — eSafety Commissioner, 2024
Dec 2025
Australia's world-first Social Media Minimum Age Act came into effect — restricting under-16 access to major platforms

An independent
platform risk scorecard

Each platform is independently scored across five evidence-based harm dimensions: algorithmic aggressiveness, age verification strength, cyberbullying prevalence, body image risk, and parental control quality. Updated as new data is published.

Tk
Critical
TikTok
31% of children aged 8–12 — eSafety, 2024
Algorithm Aggression9.1/10
Age Verification1.8/10
Body Image Risk8.5/10
8.8Overall Risk
Score / 10
AutoplayInfinite ScrollFor You Algorithm
Ig
Critical
Instagram
Meta-owned — Teen Accounts introduced 2024
Algorithm Aggression8.6/10
Age Verification2.1/10
Body Image Risk9.2/10
8.6Overall Risk
Score / 10
Reels AutoplayExplore FeedSocial Comparison
Sc
High
Snapchat
19% of children aged 8–12 — eSafety, 2024
Algorithm Aggression7.2/10
Age Verification1.5/10
Cyberbullying Risk7.8/10
7.5Overall Risk
Score / 10
StreaksEphemeral ContentDiscover Feed
Yt
High
YouTube
68% of children aged 8–12 — No. 1 platform for kids
Algorithm Aggression8.0/10
Age Verification4.5/10
Content Rabbit-Hole8.3/10
7.1Overall Risk
Score / 10
Autoplay ChainRabbit-Hole EffectExempt under ban
Dc
High
Discord
Growing youth use — self-declaration age only
Unmoderated Content8.9/10
Age Verification1.0/10
Adult Content Access7.5/10
6.8Overall Risk
Score / 10
Unmoderated ServersNot covered by ban
Fb
Medium
Facebook
Declining youth use — Meta-owned
Algorithm Aggression6.5/10
Age Verification3.2/10
Misinformation Risk6.8/10
5.9Overall Risk
Score / 10
News FeedGroups
Risk Scale: Critical — 8 to 10 High — 6 to 7.9 Medium — 4 to 5.9 Lower — 0 to 3.9 Sources: eSafety Commissioner 2024 · Lancet Digital Health 2025 · SafeScroll Evidence Methodology

The scale of the problem in Australia

80%
of Australian children aged 8–12 used social media in 2024, despite minimum age policies of 13+
eSafety Commissioner, 2024
1.3M
estimated underage Australian children actively using social media in breach of platform age policies
eSafety Commissioner, 2024
+50%
rise in mental disorder prevalence among Australians aged 16–24 between 2007 and 2021
ABS National Study of Mental Health, 2022
11%
of Australian youth experience cyberbullying — and an equal proportion face unwanted online sexual solicitation
Lancet Digital Health, 2025

Australian data that
demands a response

All charts are built directly from verified Australian government datasets and academic research. Sources are linked below each visualisation.

Youth Mental Disorder Prevalence — 16 to 24 Year Olds
12-month prevalence (%), rising in parallel with social media adoption post-2008
Underage Social Media Use by Platform — Children Aged 8 to 12
Percentage of Australian children using each platform in 2024, all below minimum age
Psychological Distress — 18 to 24 Year Olds, 2017 to 2020
Percentage experiencing severe psychological distress, Kessler scale
Teen Platform Reach — Australians Aged 13 to 15
Percentage using each platform since January 2024, nationally representative survey

What the evidence
actually shows

Every finding is directly sourced from academic research and verified Australian government publications. All reference links are publicly accessible.

80%
Usage — Children
of Australian children aged 8–12 used at least one social media platform in 2024, representing approximately 1.3 million children in breach of minimum age policies. Most had parental knowledge or assistance to set up accounts.
+50%
Mental Health Decline
Rise in 12-month prevalence of mental disorders among Australians aged 16–24 — from 26% in 2007 to 39% in 2021. This is the sharpest increase recorded for any age group in Australia's national mental health data.
11%
Online Harm
of Australian youth experience cyberbullying, with an equal proportion experiencing unwanted online sexual solicitation. Both outcomes are strongly associated with depression, self-harm, and suicidal behaviour in the clinical literature.
73%
Dual-Use Pattern
of young Australians turn to social media for mental health support. The same platforms generating harm are being used to seek help — a dual-use pattern that complicates simple ban approaches and demands nuanced policy responses.
Strong
Body Image Risk
Body image harm and disordered eating show the strongest evidence of association with social media use among minors. Effects are predominantly indirect, mediated through social comparison mechanisms amplified by recommendation algorithms.
PLOS Global Public Health — Dane and Bhatia, Scoping Review 2023
Significant
Sleep Disruption
Social media use consistently disrupts sleep quality in young people. Sleep disruption has been independently verified as a partial mediator of mental health deterioration — creating a compounding harm pathway distinct from direct platform effects.
Sleep Medicine Reviews — Alonzo et al., Systematic Review 2021

Calculate your child's
personalised risk score

Enter basic information about your child's social media use to receive an evidence-based personalised risk assessment with specific recommendations grounded in Australian research and government data.

2 hours per day
Personalised Risk Assessment
Calculating...
Enter details to receive your personalised assessment grounded in eSafety Commissioner data and academic research.

Ask the data
anything

Powered by AI grounded exclusively in SafeScroll Australia's verified evidence base. Ask plain-language questions about platform risks, research findings, or guidance specific to your situation. Responses cite the underlying Australian research sources.

AI
SafeScroll Research Assistant
Grounded in eSafety, AIHW, ABS, and academic research
Online
AI
Hi — I am the SafeScroll Research Assistant. I can answer questions about social media's impact on Australian children using verified government data and academic research. What would you like to know?
Responses are AI-generated based on SafeScroll's verified evidence base. Not a substitute for clinical advice. For mental health support, contact Lifeline 13 11 14 or Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800.
10 questions available this session

Evidence-based tools for
every stakeholder

Guides, toolkits, datasets, and support resources curated from Australia's leading government bodies, research organisations, and mental health services. All links are verified and freely accessible.

Built for the community.
Backed by evidence.

"No Australian child should be harmed by an algorithm designed to maximise engagement, not wellbeing."

SafeScroll Australia is an independent, non-government project dedicated to translating academic research and Australian government data on social media's impact on minors into accessible, actionable information — for parents, educators, policymakers, and young people.


This project does not receive funding from social media companies. Every claim on this site is sourced from verified .gov.au publications, academic research publications, or accredited research bodies. All reference links are publicly accessible.

100% Evidence-Based No Platform Funding Open Access Government Data Sources
About

SafeScroll Australia was Architect, Orchastreted and built by Atiar Khan (Ati's Portfolio) , an independent researcher, as a personal research project bridging the gap between academic findings on social media's impact on youth and the everyday awareness needed by parents, educators, and communities — with a focus on digital wellbeing.

01
Research Translation
Complex academic findings converted into accessible insights for non-specialist audiences. The literature review is conducted so families and educators do not have to.
02
Living Data Dashboard
Platform risk scores and data visualisations are updated as new government and academic data is published — not static reports that go stale.
03
Platform Accountability
An independent platform risk scoring system, built on eSafety Commissioner transparency data, Lancet research, and academic research on algorithmic harm.
04
Policy Advocacy
Our evidence submissions directly inform implementation of Australia's Online Safety Amendment Act 2024 — the world's strictest law on underage social media access.
05
Community-First
Every resource is free, accessible, and designed for Australian families, schools, and communities. No paywalls. No advertising. No platform affiliations.

How we calculate
risk scores

Full transparency is a core principle of SafeScroll Australia. Below is an explanation of how Platform Risk Index scores are constructed, what data sources are used, and the limitations of this analysis.

01
Five Scored Dimensions
Each platform is independently assessed across five harm dimensions: Algorithmic Aggressiveness (recommendation intensity and autoplay behaviour), Age Verification Strength (based on eSafety Commissioner transparency data), Cyberbullying Prevalence (academic research literature), Body Image and Eating Disorder Risk (clinical research evidence), and Parental Control Quality (platform feature assessment). Each dimension is scored from 0 to 10.
02
Evidence Sources Used
Scores are derived exclusively from: (a) eSafety Commissioner platform transparency reports and surveys, (b) systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in academic research journals, (c) Australian government data from AIHW and ABS, and (d) regulatory filings and public disclosures by platforms themselves. No proprietary or unverified data is used.
03
Editorial Scoring Process
Dimension scores are weighted equally to produce an overall risk score. Scores represent SafeScroll Australia's independent editorial analysis and constitute opinion based on disclosed publicly available facts. They do not represent regulatory determinations, legal findings, or clinical assessments. Scores are reviewed when significant new government data or academic research is released.
04
Known Limitations
Platform algorithm behaviour is not fully disclosed by companies, meaning scores reflect observable effects rather than internal mechanisms. Research on algorithmic harm is an evolving field with methodological limitations acknowledged in the literature. Scores reflect the balance of available evidence at the time of last review and should be interpreted accordingly. SafeScroll Australia does not claim scores are definitive or exhaustive.
05
Last Review and Update Schedule
Current scores reflect evidence available as of March 2026. SafeScroll Australia commits to reviewing scores when the eSafety Commissioner publishes new transparency data, when the AIHW or ABS releases updated youth mental health statistics, or when a significant systematic review is published in academic research. All data source links are verified at time of publication.
06
What This Site Does Not Do
SafeScroll Australia does not provide clinical advice, legal advice, or crisis support. It does not claim causal proof that social media causes mental illness — it reports and contextualises research evidence as published. It does not receive funding from social media platforms, government agencies, or political organisations. It is an independent, community-funded educational initiative.

If you or someone you know needs help right now

This site provides research and education only. If you are experiencing a mental health crisis or are concerned about a young person, please contact one of the following free Australian services immediately.

Help this reach more Australian families

SafeScroll Australia is a free, community resource. The more Australians who access this data, the greater its potential to drive positive policy change and protect young people online.

Link copied to clipboard
Important Disclaimers — Please Read
Editorial Opinion — Not a Regulatory Finding Platform Risk Index scores represent SafeScroll Australia's independent editorial analysis based on publicly available data and academic research. They constitute opinion on a matter of public interest and do not represent regulatory determinations, legal findings, or factual allegations of wrongdoing by any platform or company.
For Educational and Informational Purposes Only Content on this site is intended for community education and research awareness purposes. It does not constitute medical, psychological, clinical, or legal advice. Individuals concerned about their mental health or the wellbeing of a young person should consult a qualified health professional or contact one of the crisis services listed on this site.
Independence and Funding SafeScroll Australia is an independent project. It does not receive funding from social media platforms, technology companies, political organisations, or government agencies. All claims are sourced from publicly accessible government publications (.gov.au), academic research publications, or accredited statutory bodies. All source links are provided inline.
Data Currency and Accuracy Data and risk scores reflect evidence available at the time of last review (March 2026). Research in this field is evolving and findings may be updated as new evidence is published. SafeScroll Australia makes no warranty as to the completeness or ongoing accuracy of information presented. Users should consult primary sources directly for the most current data.